Update of the Bill Gates case in the Netherlands
december 2024
Bill Gates believes that he has not acted unlawfully. His lawyer has filed his Statement of Defence to the court in Leeuwarden. This letter is added in the text and an English translation is also available.
Mr. Gates was required to submit his written defence to the court in Leeuwarden for the role of November 27, 2024. His defense is against the summons with the claims that seven Dutch plaintiffs had filed against him on July 14, 2023 at the court in Leeuwarden. The seven plaintiffs (one of whom died on October 6, 2023 at the age of 52) have summoned Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, the Dutch State and 14 other Dutch leaders in person and as a group to appear before the court in Leeuwarden. The plaintiffs believe that they have been deliberately misled by the defendants and that the defendants – also as a group – are implementing the international project “Covid-19: The Great Reset”, of which the Covid-19 mRNA injections form an important part. The defendants thereby commit an unlawful act towards the seven plaintiffs and in fact towards the entire Dutch population, and the defendants are liable to pay damages to the seven plaintiffs and in fact towards the entire Dutch population for all material and immaterial damage that they and in fact the entire Dutch population have suffered and are still suffering as a result of the unlawful project Covid-19: The Great Reset and the associated Covid-19 (mRNA) injections.
Bill Gates' lawyer has filed his Statement of Defence to the Leeuwarden District Court. The Stichting Recht Op Recht has published his procedural document on its website . This document is in Dutch.
The English translation can be found here: conclusion of answer english version def *. The other defendants had already responded in writing with a Statement of Defence. Some are published on the website of the ROR foundation.
Bill Gates' Statement of Defence states in broad terms the following:
Gates claims that the accusations against him are incorrect. He did not mislead the plaintiffs, nor did he act unlawfully against them in any other way. There is no basis for granting the plaintiffs' claims, according to Mr. Gates' lawyer.
Bill Gates lost the jurisdiction incident he initiated against the seven plaintiffs in the court in Leeuwarden.
Bill Gates was of the opinion that the Dutch judge and the court in Leeuwarden would not be competent to judge him, because he is an American citizen. The case was heard in Leeuwarden on September 18th 2024. Bill Gates himself did not appear before the court in Leeuwarden, but was represented by his lawyer from PelsRijcken Advocaten.
Zebra Inspiratie was present at the court and at the press conference that day (in Dutch).
On October 16th, the court in Leeuwarden rendered a verdict and determined that the judge in the Netherlands and the court in Leeuwarden do indeed have jurisdiction.
The claim in the civil proceedings:
Seven plaintiffs initiated their civil case on July 14, 2023, alleging that they have been deliberately misled in connection with the international project “Covid-19: The Great Reset.” The plaintiffs allege that all defendants, including Bill Gates, have personally and as a group acted unlawfully towards them by deliberately and unlawfully misleading them and thereby inducing them to undergo the life-threatening Covid-19 injections, of which Hofstra, Rutte, De Jonge, Gates, Bourla, et al. knew or at least should have known that these mRNA injections were not safe and effective and could in no way prevent transmission of infection (“you are doing it for someone else.”) – Source: see summons with 91 Productions in Dutch or English: https://rechtoprecht.online
The sequel
The plaintiffs' lawyers inform Zebra Inspiratie that on behalf of their clients, the plaintiffs, they filed a Deed of Increase of Claim pursuant to Article 130 of the Dutch Code of Civil Procedure, as well as a Deed of Submitting Vaccination Certificates of the plaintiffs and a request for a Preliminary Hearing at the court in Leeuwarden on 9 December. The plaintiffs' lawyers indicated that in the period after 14 July 2023 to the present, a great deal of peer-reviewed scientific evidence has been made public to support their claims, which they still wish to submit to the court as additional evidence. This Deed will soon be published by the ROR foundation on its website in Dutch and English.
The Increase in Claim relates to the basis of the summons. Defendants have continued unabated, even after July 14, 2023 – despite all evidence submitted by plaintiffs that the Covid-19 (mRNA) injections are not safe and effective and have never been tested / developed to prevent transmission of the alleged Sars-Cov-2 virus – to deliberately mislead the Dutch population by continuing to fully promote the Covid-19 mRNA injections and persistently stating that they are safe and effective.
In the Deed of Increase of Claim, the plaintiffs' lawyers also mentioned the 'preferred reality' co-created by the defendants , of which the project Covid-19: The Great Reset is a part. The plaintiffs note that the defendants know, each individually and as a group, or at least should have known, that the Covid-19 mRNA injections have nothing to do with public health, but were developed purely as a bioweapon for committing genocide against humanity. The plaintiffs will substantiate this internationally socially important fact in these substantive proceedings.
During the requested preliminary hearing, the court will consult with the parties' lawyers on how the substantive proceedings will be continued in terms of procedural law. It will also be determined whether and when the party experts mentioned by the claimants will be heard under oath before the court. It is therefore still unclear on which dates the parties and the party experts will have to appear in public hearings (accessible to the public) before the Leeuwarden court. All in all, these civil substantive proceedings are unique in the world and of great international social importance. The Covid-19 mRNA injections have been developed either as 'vaccines' for public health, or as 'bioweapons' against public health. The Covid-19 mRNA injections cannot be both, according to the claimants' lawyers.
More information on the substantive proceedings can be found at www.rechtoprecht.online . Financial support through donations is also possible. There is a donation page on that website.
Note to the media: for questions or additional information erica@zebrainspiratie.nl
* This version has been translated by myself and a lawyer, however no rights can be derived from this. For the correct information we refer to the official letter from Pels/Rijcken.